2015


To access this material please log in or register

Register Authorize
2015/№3

Features of oral anticoagulant effects

Geltser I. V., Smirnova O. A., Matvienko O. Yu., Kobilyanskaya V. A., Golovina O. G., Papayan L. P.
Federal State Budgetary Inatitution, “Russian Research Institute for Hematology and Transfusiology of the Federal Medicine and Biology Agency”, 2nd Sovetskaya 16, St.‑Petersburg 191024

Keywords: anticoagulant therapy, protein C system, thrombosis

DOI: 10.18087/rhj.2015.3.2085

Background. Along with the vitamin K antagonist warfarin, a group of new oral anticoagulants, including direct inhibitors of thrombin and active factor Xa (fXa), have been extensively used as the anticoagulant therapy. Already in the first days of therapy, warfarin reduces activity of important physiological anticoagulants, proteins C and S (PC, PS). Effects of fXa inhibitors on performance of natural anticoagulants in general has not been studied so far. Aim. To study effects of different anticoagulants on the PC system in patients receiving warfarin, dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Materials and methods. Patients receiving warfarin, dabigatran or rivaroxaban were evaluated. The control group included 32 healthy individuals. The PC activity (%), the general hemostatic potential of blood plasma, was evaluated using the thrombin generation test with the CAT method in two versions, with and without added rh-TM, for evaluation of the PC system anticoagulant effect. ETP values were measured, and sensitivity to TM (%) was calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of PC system performance. Results. In patients receiving warfarin, PC activity, ETP in both versions, and sensitivity to TM were considerably lower than in the control group. In patients receiving dabigatran, in spite of the normal PC level, ETP values without addition of rh-ТМ did not differ from normal, and the sensitivity to TM was sharply reduced. In the rivaroxaban treatment group, the PC activity was significantly higher than in the control group, ETP values were decreased with both versions of the method, the sensitivity to TM was high. Conclusion. Both warfarin and dabigatran facilitate the pronounced decrease in sensitivity to TM, which indicates reduced effectiveness of the PC system performance. The rivaroxaban treatment was associated with a sharp increase in this index, which suggests not only preserved function of the PC system during this treatment but also potentiation of its final effect due to the action of this inhibitor.
  1. Ройтман Е. В., Андрианова М. Ю. Актуальные вопросы применения ривароксабана. Тромбоз, гемостаз и реология. 2014;2 (58):22–6.
  2. Ansell J, Hirsh E, Hylek E et al. Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th edition). Chest. 2008 Jun;133 (6 Suppl): 160S-98S.
  3. Ansell J, Hollowell J, Pengo V et al. Descriptive analysis of the process and quality of oral anticoagulation management in real-life practice in patients with chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the international study of anticoagulation management (ISAM). J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2007 Apr;23 (2):83–91.
  4. Hirsh J, O’Donnell M, Weitz JI. New anticoagulants. Blood. 2005 Jan 15;105 (2):453–63.
  5. Weitz JI. Emerging anticoagulants for the treatment venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost. 2006 Sep;96 (3):274–84.
  6. Di Nisio M, Middeldorp S, Buller HR. Direct thrombin inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 8;353 (10):1028–40.
  7. Diener HC. Pro: «The novel oral anticoagulants should be used as 1st choice for secondary prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation». Thromb Haemost. 2013 Sep;110 (3):493–5.
  8. Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK et al. Extended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368 (8):709–18.
  9. Furugohri T, Sugiyama N, Morishima Y, Shibano T. Antithrombin-independent thrombin inhibitors, but not direct factor Xa inhibitors, enhance thrombin generation in plasma through inhibition of thrombin-thrombomodulin-protein C system. Thromb Haemost. 2011 Dec;106 (6):1076–83.
  10. Mann KG, Brummel K, Butenas S. What is all that thrombin for? J Thromb Haemost. 2003 Jul;1 (7):1504–14.
  11. Bauersachs R, Berkowitz SD, Brenner B et al. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363 (26):2499–510.
  12. Buller HR, Prins MH, Lensin AW et al. Oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of symptomatic pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 5;366 (14):1287–97.
  13. Наместников Ю. А. Диагностика гиперкоагуляции с помощью теста генерации тромбина. Автореф. дис. … канд. мед. наук. – СПб., 2012. – с 52–53.
  14. Mani H, Hesse C, Stratmann G,Lindhoff-Last E. Ex vivo effects of low-dose rivaroxaban on specific coagulation assays and coagulation factor activities in patients under real life conditions. Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;109 (1):127–36.
  15. Levi M, van der Poll T. Inflammation and coagulation. Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38 (2 Suppl): S26–34.
  16. Esmon CT. Crosstalk between inflammation and thrombosis. Maturitas. 2008 Sep-Oct;61 (1-2):122–31.
  17. Sarangi PP, Lee HW, Kim M. Activated protein C action in inflammation. Br J Haematol. 2010 Mar;148 (6):817–33.
  18. Mosnier LO, Zlokovic BV, Griffin JH. The cytoprotective protein C pathway. Blood. 2007 Apr 15;109 (8):3161–72.
  19. Joyce DE, Gelbert L, Ciaccia A et al. Gene expression profile of antithrombotic protein C defines new mechanisms modulating inflammation and apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2001 Apr 6;276 (14):11199–203.
  20. Vetrano S, Ploplis VA, Sala E et al. Unexpected role of anticoagulant protein C in controlling epithelial barrier integrity and intestinal inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011 Dec 6;108 (49):19830–5.
Geltser I. V., Smirnova O. A., Matvienko O. Yu. et al. Features of oral anticoagulant effects. Russian Heart Journal. 2015;14 (3):154–157

To access this material please log in or register

Register Authorize
Ru En