2013


To access this material please log in or register

Register Authorize
2013/№1

Comparative assessment of antihypertensive efficacy of Indapamide-retard and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertonic patients, uncontrolled RAAS blocker monotherapy

Kobalava Zh. D., Kotovskaya Yu. V., Pavlova E. A.

Keywords: antihypertensive ther apy, hyperpiesis, hydrochlorothiazide, indapamide, tr eatment, RAAS

DOI: 10.18087/rhj.2013.1.1798

Relevance. Use of outpatient BP registration methods allows reveal patient groups with latent inadequate treatment efficiency, characterized by adverse forecast and requiring stronger antihypertensive therapy. Objective. Comparison of efficiency and safety of introduction hydrochlorothiazide or indapamide retard to monotherapy by ACE inhibitor or ARB blocker concerning clinical BP and indicators of 24‑hour BP monitoring. Materials and methods. 44 patients were included to the research with level clinical BP >150 / 90 mm Hg and 24‑hour BP >135 / 85 mm Hg against ACE inhibitor or ARB blocker monotherapy in the maximum recommended doses within not less than 6 weeks. Patients were randomized for open-label administration of hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg / day or indapamide retard 1.5 mg / day for 12 weeks. Before prescription of diuretics and in 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of the combined therapy, serum creatinine, potassium, uric acid, and plasma glucose fasting levels were detected, GFR was calculated by MDRD formula. Results. The study showed high efficiency of free combinations RAAS blockers with indapamide retard 1.5 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg concerning achievement of clinical BP control. The antihypertensive effect of combinations was characterized by low frequency of the latent treatment inefficiency evaluated based on clinical and 24‑hour BP comparison. Combination treatment was accompanied by a comparable tolerance and safety profile concerning renal function, potassium and metabolic levels. Conclusion. Advantages of indapamide retard 1.5 mg comparison with hydrochlorothiazide as the second agent are faster achievement of the target clinical BP, decrease of BP variability from visit to visit, more expressed decrease of night BP with increased expressiveness of BP diphasic rhythm.
  1. Диагностика и лечение артериальной гипертензии (Рекомендации Российского медицинского общества по артериальной Диагностика и лечение артериальной гипертензии (Рекомендации Российского медицинского общества). Системные гипертензии. 2010;3:5–26.
  2. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A et al. 2007 ESH-ESC Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: ESH-ESC Task Force on the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2007;25 (9):1751–1762.
  3. Byrd JB, Zeng C, Tavel HM et al. Combination therapy as initial treatment for newly diagnosed hypertension. Am Heart J. 2011;162 (2):340–346.
  4. Леонова М. В., Белоусов Д. Ю., Штейнберг Л. Л. аналитическая группа исследования ПИФАГОР. Анализ врачебной практики проведения антигипертензивной терапии в России (по данным исследования ПИФАГОР III). Фарматека. 2009;12:98–103.
  5. Леонова М. В., Белоусов Д. Ю., Штейнберг Л. Л., Галицкий А. А., Белоусов Ю. Б., аналитическая группа исследования ПИФАГОР. Результаты фармакоэпидемиологического исследования артериальной гипертонии ПИФАГОР III. Системные гипертензии. 2010;1:1:8–15.
  6. Моисеев В. С., Кобалава Ж. Д. АРГУС. Артериальная гипертония у лиц старших возрастных групп. Медицинское информационное агентство, Москва 2002.–447 с.
  7. Bobrie G, Clerson P, Cuchet A et al. [Prevalence and mechanism of masked hypertension: the ol'mesures survey]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2006;99 (7-8):760–763.
  8. Mancia G, Facchetti R, Bombelli M et al. Long-term risk of mortality associated with selective and combined elevation in office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension. 2006;47 (5):846–853.
  9. Hansen TW, Li Y, Boggia J, Thijs L et al. Predictive role of the nighttime blood pressure. Hypertension. 2011;57 (1):3–10.
  10. Schillaci G, Pucci G. The importance of instability and visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010;8 (8):1095–1097.
  11. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010;375 (9718):895–905.
  12. Кобалава Ж. Д., Котовская Ю. В., Старостина Е. Г. и др. Пути улучшения контроля артериальной гипертонии. Основные результаты российской научно-практической программы АРГУС-2. Клиническая фармакология и терапия. 2007;16 (2):18–25.
  13. Emeriau JP, Knauf H, Pujadas JO et al. A comparison of indapamide SR 1.5 mg with both amlodipine 5 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in elderly hypertensive patients: a randomized double-blind controlled study. J Hypertens. 2001;19 (2):343–350.
  14. Zhang Y, Agnoletti D, Safar ME, Blacher J. Effect of antihypertensive agents on blood pressure variability: the Natrilix SR versus candesartan and amlodipine in the reduction of systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients (X–CELLENT) study. Hypertension. 2011;58 (2):155–160.
  15. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojón A, Fernández JR. Decreasing sleep-time blood pressure determined by ambulatory monitoring reduces cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58 (11):1165–1173.
  16. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojón A, Fernández JR. Influence of time of day of blood pressure-lowering treatment on cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34 (6):1270–1276.
  17. Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojon A, Fernandez JR. Decreasing asleep ambulatory blood pressure reduces cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease. J Clin Hypertension. 2012;14 (Suppl 1):219.
  18. Pineiro L, Moya A, Crespo JJ et al; Effects of hypertension treatment-time on ambulatory blood pressure in chronic kidney disease: the HYGIA project. J Clin Hypertension. 2012;14 (Suppl 1):16.
  19. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;35 (Suppl 1):S11–63.
Kobalava Zh. D., Kotovskaya Yu. V., Pavlova E. A. Comparative assessment of antihypertensive efficacy of Indapamide-retard and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertonic patients, uncontrolled RAAS blocker monotherapy. Russian Heart Journal. 2013;12(1):42-47

To access this material please log in or register

Register Authorize
Ru En