Russian Heart Failure Journal 2011year Importance of arteria hardness, central return wave values and vasculomotor functions of microvasculature endothelium at CHF of different etiology and failure severity


To access this material please log in or register

Register Authorize
2011/

Importance of arteria hardness, central return wave values and vasculomotor functions of microvasculature endothelium at CHF of different etiology and failure severity

Osmolovskaya Yu. F.1, Mareyev V. Yu.2, Glechan А. M.1, Balachonova T. V.1
1 - Federal State Budgetary Institution, “Russian Cardiology Research and Production Complex” of the RF Ministry of Health Care, 3rd Cherepkovskaya 15a, Moscow 121552
2 - Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education “M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University”, Leninskie Gory 1, GSP-1, Moscow 119992

Keywords: circulatory decompensation, vessels hardnes, microcirculation, CHF, endothelial dysfunction

DOI: 10.18087/rhfj.2011.5.1584

Relevancy. Increase of vessels hardness approved one of the mechanisms underlying an increase of systolic and pulse pressure and as a result became an important causative factor of cardiovascular diseases. However today we have an insufficient study of the significance of vessels hardness, central return wave as well as endothelial function of microvasculature at CHF with safe and reduced systolic function of left ventricle. Objective. Evaluation of vessels hardness and endothelial function of microvasculature and their significance at CHF with safe (CHF–cardiovascular function) and reduced systolic function (SCHF) of left ventricle of a different ethiology and failure severity. Materials and methods. This research included 134 CHF I–IV FC NYHA patients with sinoatrial rate and 30 non – CHF patients included into the control group. CHF patients were divided into two subgroups: patients with ejection fraction of <40 % (SCHF, n=84) and with ejection fraction of <45 % and proved diastolic dysfunction (CHF–cardiovasculare function, n=50). Evaluation of the vessels hardness were made by the method of applanation tonometry: evaluation of pulse-wave velocity (PWV) on a carotic femoral section, characteristics of central return wave (in aorta): average arteriotony, central systolic arteriotony, central pulse pressure, central diastolic pressure, augmentation index, augmentation index / heart rate 75. Vasculomotor function of microvasculature endothelium or microvasculature vasculoreactivity was defined by photoplethysmography of nail bed vessels at the initial stage and reactive hyperemia phase. Evaluation of the clinical state was carried out based on the results of the 6 minutes walking test, Minnesotan QOL questionnaire, rating scale of a clinical state. All patients received recommended CHF therapy. Results. While increasing CHF severity, both at safe and reduced contractile function of left ventricle there is a decrease of such indicants as vessels hardness, central return wave and microvasculature, however authentic relations with FC CHF are revealed for pulse-wave velocity (PWV) only. SCHF patient of associated age did not show the authentic relation of failure for such parameters as vessels hardness and central return wave with heart failure ethiology (ischemic heart disease / dilated cardiomyopathy); at that microvasculature failure were more expressed with ischemic heart disease patients as compared to dilated cardiomyopathy patients.
  1. O'Rourke MF, Nichols WW. Aortic diameter, aortic stiffness, and wave reflection increase with age and isolated systolic hypertension. Hypertension. 2005;45 (4):652–658.
  2. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R et all. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2001;37 (5):1236–1241.
  3. Desai AS, Mitchell GF, Fang JC, Creager MA. Central aortic stiffness is increased in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. J Card Fail. 2009;15 (8):658–664.
  4. Yambe M, Tomiyama H, Hirayama Y et al. Arterial stiffening as a possible risk factor for both atherosclerosis and diastolic heart failure. Hypertens Res. 2004;27 (9):625–631.
  5. Schram MT, Henry RM, van Dijk RA et al. Increased central artery stiffness in impaired glucose metabolism and type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn Study. Hypertension. 2004;43 (2):176–181.
  6. Wildman RP, Mackey RH, Bostom A et al. Measures of obesity are associated with vascular stiffness in young and older adults. Hypertension. 2003;42 (4):468–473.
  7. Blacher J, Safar ME, Pannier B et al. Prognostic significance of arterial stiffness measurements in end-stage renal disease patients. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2002;11 (6):629–634.
  8. Mitchell GF, Parise H, Benjamin EJ et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 2004;43 (6):1239–1245.
  9. Афанасьев Ю. И., Юрина Н. А., Котовский Е. Ф. Гистология: учебник. Под ред. Афанасьева. – М.: Медицина, 2001. – 743.
  10. Hopkins K. D.,Lehmann ED, Gosling RG et al. Biochemichemical correlates of aortic distensibility in vivo in normal subjects. Clin Sci (Lond). 1993;84 (6):593–597.
  11. Safar ME, O’Rourke MF. Arterial stiffness in hypertension In: Handbook of Hypertension, Vol. 23. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006.
  12. Westerhof N, O’Rourke MF. Haemodynamic basis for the development of left ventricular failure in systolic hypertension and for its logical therapy. J Hypertens. 1995;13 (9):943–952.
  13. Arnold JM, Marchiori GE, Imrie JR et al. Large artery function in patients with chronic heart failure. Studies of brachial artery diameter and hemodynamics. Circulation. 1991;84 (6):2418–2425.
  14. Голухова Е. З., Алиева А. М. Клиническое значение определения натрий­уретических пептидов у больных с хронической сердечной недостаточно­стью. Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия. 2007;47 (1):45–51.
  15. Ooi H, Chung W, Biolo A. Arterial stiffness and vascular load in heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2008;14 (1):31–36.
  16. Zile MR, Brutsaert DL. New concepts in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure: Part I: diagnosis, prognosis, and measurements of diastolic function. Circulation. 2002;105 (11):1387–1393.
  17. Balmain S, Padmanabhan N, Ferrell WR et al. Differences in arterial compliance, microvascular function and venous capacitance between patients with heart failure and either preserved or reduced left ventricular systolic function. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007;9 (9):865–871.
  18. Kang S, Fan HM, Li J et al. Relationship of arterial stiffness and early mild diastolic heart failure in general middle and aged population. Eur Heart J. 2010;31 (22):2799–2807.
  19. Burkhoff D, Maurer MS, Packer M. Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: is it really a disorder of diastolic function? Circulation. 2003;107 (5):656–658.
  20. Hundley WG, Kitzman DW, Morgan TM et al. Cardiac cycle-dependent changes in aortic area and distensibility are reduced in older patients with isolated diastolic heart failure and correlate with exercise intolerance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38 (3):796–802.
  21. Kawaguchi M, Hay I, Fetics B, Kass DA. Combined ventricular systolic and arterial stiffening in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2003;107 (5):714–720.
  22. Kass DA. Is heart failure with decent systole due to bad diastole? J Card Fail. 2005;11 (3):188–190.
  23. Steendijk P. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Diastolic dysfunction, subtle systolic dysfunction, systolic-ventricular and arterial stif­fening, or misdiagnosis? Cardiovasc Res. 2004;64 (1):9–11.
  24. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Borlaug BA et al. Age- and gender-related ventricular-vascular stiffening: a community based study. Circulation. 2005;112 (15):2254–2262.
  25. Kass DA. Ventricular arterial stiffening. Integrating the pathophysiology. Hypertension. 2005;46 (1):185–193
  26. Mottram PM, Haluska BA, Leano R et al. Relation of arterial stiffness to diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive heart disease. Heart. 2005;91 (12):1551–1556.
  27. Орлова Я. А. Нуралиев Э. Ю. Балдина О. Н., и др. Скорость пульсовой волны – предиктор развития сердечно-сосудистых осложнений у мужчин с ИБС. Кардиологический вестник. 2007;2 (1):17–22.
  28. Орлова Я. А., Макарова Г. В., Яровая Е. Б. и др. Прогностическое значение различных параметров артериальной жесткости при ИБС. Сердце. 2009;8 (2):98–103.
  29. Илюхин О. В., Илюхина М. В., Калганова Е. Л., Лопатин Ю. М. Эласти­ческие свойства и реактивность магистральных артерий у больных с ишемической болезнью сердца. Современные аспекты диагностики, лечения и профилактики в кардиологии: сборник научных трудов. – Саратов: 2005. – С. 56–60.
  30. Илюхин О. В., Калганова Е. Л.,. Лопатин Ю. М. Эластичность и реактивность магистральных артерий у больных ишемической болезнью сердца, осложнённой сердечной недостаточностью. Кардиология. 2005;45 (10):52–53.
Osmolovskaya Yu. F., Mareyev V. Yu., Glechan А. M. et al. Importance of arteria hardness, central return wave values and vasculomotor functions of microvasculature endothelium at CHF of different etiology and failure severity. Russian Heart Failure Journal. 2011;12(5):270-276.

To access this material please log in or register

Register Authorize
Ru En